The fact that not a single legal meeting has taken place with the most important 2nd level court, the Borgarting lagmannsrett, settles this question.
Further, evidently, their verdict against me on grounds of missing requirements to serving the summons must be the instance of very black legal humour... hence the violation of "The Courts' Act" (NO: "Domstolloven"), to have the cases legally processed effectively according to profession and demands from society to rule of law.
This judgment is likely to obtain with the most novice chess-player, only some interest present.
On grounds that I may not be able to "come out of Norway alive", I choose to publish the list of legal documents, all that I have privately, in order to secure the "justice after my death".
The List:
The High Court of Justice, "Høyesterett". Verdict: Appeal dismissed.
The County Court, 2nd Level Court, "Borgarting lagmannsrett". Verdict: Appeal dismissed, the summons lacking the requirements. See "Domstolloven", the Courts' Act.
The Magistrates' Court, Local Court, "Asker og Bærum tingrett". Verdict: Defeat, the summons dismissed, a result that I've "provoked" because of judge's failure to understand "Common process" -> "NO: Fastsettelsesdom", verdict of guilt.
The documents:
- Høyesterett, Case no. 1170/2013. Date: 2013-06-25.
Høyesterett: 1 document by records.
- 13-065948ASK-BORG/04 - Document no. 26 - Date: 2013-06-14.-> Borgarting lagmannsrett
- 13-065948ASK-BORG/04 - Document no. 25 - Date: 2013-06-14.-> Borgarting lagmannsrett
- 13-065948ASK-BORG/04 - Document no. 18 - Date: 2013-05-10.-> Borgarting lagmannsrett
- 13-065948ASK-BORG/04 - Document no. 10 - Date: 2013-04-23.-> Borgarting lagmannsrett
Borgarting lagmannsrett: 4 documents by records.
- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 40 - Date: 2013-04-15.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett
- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 31 - Date: 2013-03-25.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett
- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 19 - Date: 2013-03-08.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett
- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 18 - Date: 2013-03-07.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett
- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 12 - Date: 2013-02-25.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett
- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 5 - Date: 2013-01-15.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett
- 12-197086TVI-AHER/2 - Document no. 3 - Date: 2012-12-13.-> Asker og Bærum tingrett
Asker og Bærum tingrett: 7 documents by records.Formally: Summons delivered November/December 2012.The Local Court contacted already in April, 2012.
Digitally signed: T. Leonardo F. Olsnes-Lea, full legal name, Norway.
The failure of publishing my verdict from the Norwegian High Court of Justice (Høyesterett) and violating Norwegian law (offentleglova, offl.), makes me do it myself, that I'm no deluded idiot with a imaginary 2013/1170:
1
2
The underlying facts for my case against Norway are, in terms of ECtHR by ECHR, Art. 6.1:
3
The failure, refusing me to deliver a complaint straight, of the police to comply with the police instructions under the Police Act, "Politiloven", also constitues "an attack on my person by obstructing my right to personal weapon".
4
Finally, my complaint gets registered by the police in 2003, subverting my course to justice by 3 years, minimally, and after a long strenuous process, after first having contacted various people in Farsund "kommune", first and foremost the police there, 5 times, starting with 1992, possibly, one contact with Kristiansand police while attending school there in 1996, February or so, one time in Oslo, late winter before spring in 1999, moving to Sandnes, definitely CUTTING the Farsund connection for good in 2000, despite a temporary stay there again in 2005.
Not being (mentally) able to send/finish (various threat set-ups/tech-eyes/physician actuation/the torture clinic?) the papers to ECtHR are not like they should be. I also lack the "diplomatic code" for exiting the country in one piece, with clothes on and not tortured out of shape. I still seek the proper ruling by ECtHR and that I've declared publicly on Facebook that "I sue Norway by ECtHR", for you to consider. Bye.
ReplyDeleteExtra legal considerations (after filing the Lawyer's Association to the National Assembly for denying me lawyer's services):
ReplyDeleteThe Case of Mine - 1170/2013 - While Facebook is working... USA declares scant note from Ol*nes-Lea, that Humieanist...
For the High Court of Justice, Høyesterett, three measures of punishment exist in case of blatant wrongdoing/corrupt ruling:- The Court case against any of its members for high treason, i.e., such as Nixon by the Watergate Scandal. (NO: Riksrettssak.)- Plain dismissal from job, leave in dishonour.- Legal blindness, the insanity notions in having provided corrupt ruling (only/blatantly/failed horribly/shown deep misbehaviour.
Other, the High Court of Justice can't simply provide corrupt ruling because they, by this, commit "attacks" on own legal system, and these are not permitted in any sense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Justicehttp://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norges_Høyesteretthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECtHRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
This remains as one hope by their "approval" for 30 years + of awful crime against myself and my family, supporting criminal syndicate, Dr. Schwein, Dr. Ev-il/"Mars-choc.-"anger and the rest of the sh*theads!
"Taken out and shot on street?" because they are corrupt?!
My case: 1170/2013 - by http://www.domstol.no/no/Enkelt-domstol/-Norges-Hoyesterett/Avgjorelser/Avgjorelser-2013/Avdeling---Sivile-saker/ ...
High Court of Justice - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaen.wikipedia.orgHer Majesty's High Court of Justice in England (usually known as the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, the High Court of Justice or, simply, the High Court) is, together with the Court of Appeal and the Crown Court, one of the Senior Courts of England and Wales. Its name is abbreviated as…
The "Høyesterett" is to resume 12th August, only one day, tomorrow, on Monday.
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riksrett_(Norge)http://www.stortinget.no/no/Stortinget-og-demokratiet/Arbeidet/Riksrett/ .http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-19320205-002.html .
(NO: riksrettssak = riksrett , i.e., riksrettssaken er SATT!)
EN: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_(Norway) .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment
After the declared intention to take Norway to the Court of ECtHR (above), this is it:
ReplyDeleteAnnouncement: I have a date set for the application to ECtHR by 2. September, 2013, given the awful circumstances down to personal cleanliness and getting out to buy necessities/the dailies.
Given the _legal_ circumstances of all crime committed against me under the responsibility of Norway by the Justice Department, I expect them, the State of Norway auto-DEFEATED for LONG, HARD 30 years (+)!
It should also read above:
ReplyDelete"The documents:
- Høyesterett, Case no. 2013/1170. Date: 2013-06-25.", but deep irritation with the High Court of Justice in them ruling against me, has made me reverse the 2 correct numbers above.
My Case is Made Public as Consequence by Subversion of Norway
ReplyDeleteOn p. III of the Official Text from ECtHR, my application is by this known to read, reaching the place, dead or alive:
II. Statement of the Facts
14.
Norway has prevented me from getting represented in the Courts (all levels) either by the police, the Justice Department, or by myself/my father.
There are also additional charges against the State of Norway over (criminally) blocked/seized mail to the extent of 30 Mn + letters and parcels (by word/hearsay). This remains, though, plausible, since I've had a considerable stature by my name, Terje Lea, back then, aged 6/7 - 23+.
In addition, there are (criminally) blocked telephones to the house phone and more and "other strange actions" from the public phone company, Televerket / Telenor, now part private/part publicly owned, State GUN or not, to other countries.
So this revolves in short over severe /crimes/ against humanity, by Art. 6.1 of the ECHR, The Human Rights Act (NO: Menneskerettsloven), in some legislations, that is the legal defence for all citizens under ECHR to "access to the courts" and "fair hearing", basically implying the right to take one's case to the courts and be heard there as well, i.e., to have one's legal trial carried through!
Beyond this, there are some aspects concerning socio-political/economical motives for these crimes committed against my family and myself.
The Last important points to the application going to ECtHR.
ReplyDelete15.
Art. 6.1, ECHR, The European Convention for Human Rights (The Human Rights Act under Norwegian laws).
V. Statement of the object of the application
19.
Under the claim for common process, verdict of guilt (NO: "fastsettelsesdom"), where the defendant, Justice Department of Norway by State of Norway (NO: Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet), the plaintiff party demands the defendant to be declared GUILTY by "in flagrante delicto" crimes against my fundamental rights, my human rights, as given by ECHR, as these crimes have taken place over a long period of time, more than 30 years!
(Exempt from my application: You know, as these people roll about like god-d*mn stupid people, thinking they can get away with many changes to what has been
the Justice Department THEN
the Police- and Emergency Department THEN
the Justice- and Emergency Department.
This idiocy needs to come down to where it should be, such "exalted" retardedness against the public.)
ReplyDeleteMy action to take Norway to the ECtHR in suing them for violating my Human Rights (ECHR) must be considered suspended for now.
This is due to the High Court of Justice's (Norway: Høyesterett) failure to publish my case there, making me doubt having a valid verdict in my hands, even after picking up legal mail that I've had to sign for:
www.lovdata.no/hr , my date, 25. June, 2013/1170.
www.domstol.no/hoyesterett .
The document from High Court in Norway:
Norges Høyesterett
Den 25. juni 2013 ble det av Høyesteretts ankeutvalg bestående av dommerne Øie, Bårdsen og Kallerud i
HR-2013-01341-U, (sak nr. 2013/1170), sivil sak, anke over kjennelse:
Terje Leonardo Ferdinand Olsnes-Lea [my legal name]
mot
Staten v/Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet (Regjeringsadvokaten v/advokat Jenny Sandvig)
avsagt slik
KJENNELSE :
Terje Leonardo Ferdinand Olsnes-Lea har erklært anke over Borgarting lagmannsretts kjennelse 22. april 2013 i sak nr. 13-065948ASK-BORG/04 mot staten v/Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet.
Høyesteretts ankeutvalg, som bare kan prøve lagmannsrettens saksbehandling og lovtolkning, jf. tvisteloven § 30-6, finner det enstemmig klart at anken ikke kan føre frem. Anken blir derfor å forkaste i medhold av tvisteloven § 30-9 annet ledd.
Ankemotparten har ikke krevd sakskostnader.
SLUTNING :
Anken forkastes.
Arnfinn Bårdsen Toril M. Øie Knut H. Kallerud
(sign.) (sign.) (sign.)
Riktig utskrift:
Merete A. Utgard [håndskrift - fortolket]
[Scantly delivered from them, probably, only one page of verdict. Page: 1, one.]
Errors: Borgarting 2nd level court in failing the important guidance requirement by the fundamental Courts Act [NO: Domstolloven - see prosecuting self, person who is not an educated lawyer.]
That I will now get in touch with an Advocate / Solicitor Advocate [NO: univocally, "Advokat (H)"] who have passed exams to "meet with the High Court of Justice" in Norway.
The whole thing should be swift, practically speaking, taking no more than one day.
(The High Court of Justice in Norway may also have violated, now, the publishing laws for official documents.)
Details have now been completed, apart from some, to ECtHR and no sooner than this either because of dangers/torture threats straight "against my throat", possibly medical torture right around the corner given a Norwegian behaviour of "with the ten+ Norwegian fingers of international crimes of the most serious kind":
ReplyDeleteShould I only meet up in own person then all done?
Copy of police forced commitment to psychiatry in trying to fill out a complaint at the police station, also stating a wish to do this to the police officer on duty by the desk.
The statement from psychiatry reads: [basic medical information by Rogaland Psychiatric Hospital, NO: RPS] - Nothing interesting really, something they should submit on hard request.
Still, I mention these 3 names of responsibility: Johnny Hillgren (police psychiatrist), Arvid Malde (police chief of Rogaland) and journal by Ole Jossang/Jøssang, assistant physician.
Date: 3. July 2000, the day before US. 4th July, all weapons included.
Complaint finally registered in 2003, police effectively delaying my complaint 3 years. Obstruction of justice? Also after at least 5 contacts to Farsund police and 1 contact to the Kristiansand police in 1996, February(?). Document from the police that /I/ have had to obtain states:
[Code:] 7819624
22/01-03 [22. January 2003]
My investigation "grid" reads: places, possible perpetrators, time, various other details like looks, method of abduction, secure observations etc.
After "100s of considerations" of lying in the line of duty by all sort of people to public trust, human nature, corrupt minds, etc., I finally manage to deliver the sermons myself against the Norwegian Justice Department only in 2012, also by trauma-management, various hardship, 12 years of own police investigation and threats of the most serious kinds, possibly including Schwein A. medical torture/psychiatric/neurological torture.
Logically now, by the latest additions also, it is clear that I have law on my side against the Justice Department of Norway (JD) and that they are by this "auto-defeated", possibly also by verdict by absence in realising the shame of the police forces involved.
ReplyDeleteA long time has passed, having ditched more ambitious turns to start the first steps in investigations in 1994, disappointed with failing sr. high school despite..., and stepping up the efforts in 2000 or so in preparing the police complaint and seeing it all through to this day, "through the rain and storms of trauma based life management and (medical) torture clinic in support for them", we read 2013, October.
Norway has become defeated in absentia given my reference from Norway and its High Court of Justice (NO: "Høyesterett"), 2013/1170.
ReplyDeleteNorway has become (auto-)defeated, defeated in absentia, for preventing me to arrive in Strasbourg, France, by the EctHR in decent manner given my blatant right to appear there after a legal process taking more than 1 year and a judge at the local court failing to understand the precedent by ECtHR that a verdict of guilt (NO: "fastsettelsesdom") is only needed under the ECHR given the Norwegian legal reference straight from the journal of the High Court of Justice, "Rt. 2003, p. 351" (EN: "p." = NO: "s.").
Today, 25. December, 2013, despite 1 month and seven days before the 6 months deadline for these applications to be sent, I have no foreseeable chance to make this come through as I have "no lawyer to travel with to ECtHR" as the rule is, the communcation with a lawyer not even achieved with them having the darkest motives for this.
Therefore, the Norwegian authorities can sit there and watch this day roll in on the 25. December this year, exactly, give or take some formal time for it being Christmas holiday.
--------
"Let me claim myself to ill to reach ECtHR before this time." Them citing "much fun with tech-eyes and starving him down by a nearby torture clinic!"
Let's hope they get much of the Christmas food stuck in their bl**dy throats!
There will be no application sent to the ECtHR given the reason that I can't expect this nation, Norway, to allow me to travel there in safety and on time and make a straight presentation of my case and to return to my home! The course of the three former trials/legal processes has shown that they do not admit the necessary security (to even buy food). Now you know why!
ReplyDeleteNote: I still withhold the right to "lay aside" this legal action of mine if one high ranking lawyer turns up to solve the whole scandal. One should also bear in mind that any (false) verdict of the High Court of Justice / Supreme Court can be overturned "in light of new information". That only truth and laws and regulations govern the activity of the High Court of Justice / the Supreme Court!